Identifies and describes the population.

Nurses-led telephone Intervention program: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 2: Nurse-led telephone Intervention program: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO #4 and8)Nurse-led telephone Intervention program

CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO #4 and8) POINTS: This assignment is worth 225 points.

DUE DATE: Submit to the Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sundayat the end of Week 5.Nurses-led telephone Intervention program

REQUIREMENTS

1. Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library. Retrieve the following research articles:Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions. Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017).

Quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A pilot study. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. 203132. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132. Retrieved from http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site

Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., &Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: A qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1. Retrieved from http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live 2. Download the NR439_Reading_Research_Literature_form. 3. Watch the video on how to complete this assignment at http://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0. 4. Type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your formdoes NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences. 5. Save the fileby clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form_Smith.docx. 6. Submit to the Week 5 Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. Please post questions about this paper in the Week 5Q&A Forum.

GRADING CRITERIA Category Points % Description Velayutham, et al article: Question 1 10 4% Identifies the purpose of the research article. Question 2 10 4% Identifies the research question implied in the study. Question 3 10 4% Describes the research design of the study. Question 4 10 4% Identifies and describes the population. Question 5 10 4% Was the sample approach adequate for the research design Question 6 10 4% Describe the data collection procedure Question 7 10 4% How were the data analyzed Question 8 10 4% Describes the limitations in the study.

Question 9 10 4% Describes the authors’ conclusions.

Question 10 10 5% How does this advance knowledge in the field. Pals et al article:

Question 11 10 5% Identifies the purpose of the research article.

Question 12 10 5% Identifies the research question implied in the study.

Question 13 10 5% Describes the research design of the study.

Question 14 10 5% Identifies and describes the population.

Question 15 10 5% Was the sample approach adequate for the research design

Question 16 10 5%

Describe the data collection procedure

Question 17 10 5% How were the data analyzed Question 18 10 5% Describes the limitations in the study. Question 19 10 5% Describes the authors’ conclusions.

Question 20 10 5% How does this advance knowledge in the field. Style and Writing 25 11% Names file, includes name on paper.

Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. Total 225 pts 100% A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements Reading Research Literature – Week 5 Type your answers to the following questions using complete sentences and correct grammar, spelling, and syntax. Click Save as and save the file with your last name and assignment, e.g., NR439_Reading_Research_Literature_Smith.Submit by 11:59 pm MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. The guidelines and grading rubric for this assignment may be found on the assignment page. Title: RRL Name:[replace this text with your name] The following questions pertain to: Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease: A pilot study. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132 .chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site”>http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site

1) What is the purpose of this research?

2) What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.

3) Give a complete description of theresearch design of this study.

4) What is the population (sample) for this study.

5) Was the simple approach adequate for the research design that was selected and explain why

6)

Nurses-led telephone Intervention program: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 2: Nurses-led telephone Intervention program: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO #4 and8)Nurses-led telephone Intervention program

CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO #4 and8) POINTS:This assignment is worth 225 points.

DUE DATE:Submit to the Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sundayat the end of Week 5.Nurses-led telephone Intervention program

REQUIREMENTS

1. Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library. Retrieve the following research articles:Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions. Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017).

Quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A pilot study. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. 203132. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132. Retrieved from http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site

Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., &Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: A qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1. Retrieved from http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live 2. Download the NR439_Reading_Research_Literature_form. 3. Watch the video on how to complete this assignment at http://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0. 4. Type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your formdoes NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences. 5. Save the fileby clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form_Smith.docx. 6. Submit to the Week 5 Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. Please post questions about this paper in the Week 5Q&A Forum.

GRADING CRITERIA Category Points % Description Velayutham, et al article: Question 1 10 4% Identifies the purpose of the research article. Question 2 10 4% Identifies the research question implied in the study. Question 3 10 4% Describes the research design of the study. Question 4 10 4% Identifies and describes the population. Question 5 10 4% Was the sample approach adequate for the research design Question 6 10 4% Describe the data collection procedure Question 7 10 4% How were the data analyzed Question 8 10 4% Describes the limitations in the study.

Question 9 10 4% Describes the authors’ conclusions.

Question 10 10 5% How does this advance knowledge in the field. Pals et al article:

Question 11 10 5% Identifies the purpose of the research article.

Question 12 10 5% Identifies the research question implied in the study.

Question 13 10 5% Describes the research design of the study.

Question 14 10 5% Identifies and describes the population.

Question 15 10 5% Was the sample approach adequate for the research design

Question 16 10 5%

Describe the data collection procedure

Question 17 10 5% How were the data analyzed Question 18 10 5% Describes the limitations in the study. Question 19 10 5% Describes the authors’ conclusions.

Question 20 10 5% How does this advance knowledge in the field. Style and Writing 25 11% Names file, includes name on paper.

Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. Total 225 pts 100% A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements Reading Research Literature – Week 5 Type your answers to the following questions using complete sentences and correct grammar, spelling, and syntax. Click Save as and save the file with your last name and assignment, e.g.,NR439_Reading_Research_Literature_Smith.Submit by 11:59 pm MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. The guidelines and grading rubric for this assignment may be found on the assignment page. Title: RRL Name:[replace this text with your name] The following questions pertain to: Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A pilot study. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132 .chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site”>http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site

1) What is the purpose of this research?

2) What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.

3) Give a complete description of theresearch design of this study.

4) What is the population (sample) for this study.

5) Was the sampleapproach adequate for the research design that was selected and explain why

6) Describe the data collection procedure.

7) How were the data analyzed after collection?

8) Discuss the limitations found in the study.

9) Discuss the authors’ conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?

10) How does this advance knowledge in the field The following questions pertain to: Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: a qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1 http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live

11) What is the purpose of this research?

12) What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.

13) Give a complete description of the research design of this study. 14) What is the population (sample) for this study?

15) Was the sample spproach adequate for the research design that was selected and explain why.

16) Describe the data collection procedure.

17) How were the data analyzed?

18) Discuss the limitations found in the study?

19) Discuss the authors’ conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?

20) How does this advance knowledge in the field. Week 6 Research Article Critique Paper Research Article Critique: Guidelines and Grading Rubric – Week 6 PURPOSE The purpose of this assignment is for the student to learn to examine, analyze, critique, and summarize an original research article. Student is to select an article from a list located in Course Resources. There is a choice of articles from whichyou must choose ONE to complete this assignment.

COURSE OUTCOMES Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to meet the following course outcomes:

CO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO #7) CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs #4 and 8)

CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs #4 and 8)

CO5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs #7 and 8) POINTS The assignment is worth a total of 175 points. DUE DATE You are to submit your paper to the Week 6 Dropbox by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6.

REQUIREMENTS Through this assignment, the student will:

1. Critique a peer-reviewed study, and in your own words, describe the research question, sample, design of study, data collection method, findings, and limitations of each. (CO 1, CO2,)

2. Summarize the research article and evaluate the significance to nursing. Do not just quote the author’s words. Paraphrase the information. (CO 4, CO5).

GUIDELINES TO WRITING THE PAPER

1. Course Resources lists articles from which you are to selectONE to analyze.

2. Retrieve the full-text version of the article from the library. Read it thoroughly.

3. Introduction (one paragraph): The introduction should be interesting and capture the reader’s attention.

a. Provide a brief description of the research article to be discussed.

b. Discuss the purpose of your paper. The purpose statement of the paper should relate to the research article reviewed and the implications that it has to evidence based nursing practice.

c. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

4. Describe the research question for this study in a paragraph.

a. Describe the research in greater detail.

b. Include your observations about this question.

c. Discuss events or trends that could have affected this question.

d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

5. Describe the research design of this study, and in your own words discuss the design.

a. Discuss the research design of the study.

b. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the type of design and hypothesize why the author utilized the design as opposed to others.

c. You will need to summarize the information from the article in your own words

6. Describethe sample.

a. Briefly describe the sample size used for this study

b. Make a judgment as to whether the sample size was adequate and defend your answer.

c. Describe the number or participants and determine if the number of participants was adequate compared to the research question and the intent of the study.

d. Are these numbers adequate? Discuss gaps in that you identified.

e. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

7. Describe the data collection method(s)’

a. Who collected the data?

b. What tools were used?

c. What were the ethical considerations addressed and discuss gaps you identified.

d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

8. Describe the limitations of the study.

a. Identify the limitations within the study

b. Describe how the limitations could be overcome in subsequent studies

c. Comment on why limitations are important to list and discuss within a study

d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

9. Describe the findings reported in the study.

a. Describe the findings reported in the study

b. Discuss whether the findings of the study answered the research question posed within the study

c. Discuss the credibility of the findings

d. If the findings do not support the research question posed within the study, what do you believe is the reason?

e. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

10. Summary

a. Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper.

b. Include a statement about the research question and the findings.

c. Discuss the probability of implementation into practice. Based on these findings, is the evidence that you found on your topic strong enough to suggest a change in practice, or an idea for practice? d. End with a concluding statement. Nurses-led telephone Intervention program

11. Citations and Referencesmust be included to support the information within each topic area.

Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. In-text citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, “How do I know this?” and then cite the source. 12. Reference Page: The Reference Page should start on a new page (insert a page break). All references should be cited within the body of the paperas (Author, year) and the full reference should be included in APA format on the reference page. A url link alone is not an adequate reference. See the APA Guidelines in Course Resources for examples of properly formatted references.

GRADING CRITERIA Category Points % Description Research Question 20 11% Describe, analyze, and summarize the research question for this study your own words. Design of Study 20 11% Describe, analyze, and summarize the research design of this study in your own words. Sample/Population of the Study 25 14% Describe, analyze, and summarize the sample in your own words. Data Collection Methods 25 14% Describe, analyze, and summarize the data collection method(s)’ in your own words. Limitations 20 12% Describe, analyze, and summarize the limitations of the study in your own words. Findings 20 12% Describe, analyze, and summarize the findings reported in the study in your own words. Summary of Article (See rubric for categories and breakdown of points.) 25 14% Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper and discuss the probability of implementation into practice. Grammar, Punctuation, and Spelling/ APA Formatting 20 12% No errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and APA formatting. Total 175 100% A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. NR439 Articles List for Week 6 Research Article Critique Katon, W., Russo, J., & Gavin, A. (2014). Predictors of postpartum depression. Journal of Women’s Health (15409996), 23(9), 753-759. doi:10.1089/jwh.2014.4824. (7p.) Persistent link to this record (Permalink): http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103890366&site=eds-live&scope=site Murfet, G. O., Allen, P., &Hingston, T. J. (2014). Maternal and neonatal health outcomes following the implementation of an innovative model of nurse practitioner-led care for diabetes in pregnancy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(5), 1150-1163.doi:10.1111/jan.12277. (14p.) Persistent link to this record (Permalink): http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104059264&site=eds-live&scope=site Stavrianopoulos, T. (2016). Impact of a nurses-led telephone Intervention program on the quality of life in patients with heart failure in a district hospital of Greece. Health Science Journal, 10(4), 1. Persistent link to this record (Permalink): http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=118362668&site=eds-live&scope=site

Nurses-led telephone Intervention program

7) How were the data analyzed after collection?

8) Discuss the limitations found in the study.

9) Discuss the authors’ conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?

10) How does this advance knowledge in the field The following questions pertain to: Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: a qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1 http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live

11) What is the purpose of this research?

12) What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.

13) Give a complete description of the research design of this study. 14) What is the population (sample) for this study?

15) Was the sample spproach adequate for the research design that was selected and explain why.

16) Describe the data collection procedure.

17) How were the data analyzed?

18) Discuss the limitations found in the study?

19) Discuss the authors’ conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?

20) How does this advance knowledge in the field. Week 6 Research Article Critique Paper Research Article Critique: Guidelines and Grading Rubric – Week 6 PURPOSE The purpose of this assignment is for the student to learn to examine, analyze, critique, and summarize an original research article. Student is to select an article from a list located in Course Resources. There is a choice of articles from whichyou must choose ONE to complete this assignment.

COURSE OUTCOMES Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to meet the following course outcomes:

CO1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO #7) CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs #4 and 8)

CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs #4 and 8)

CO5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs #7 and 8) POINTS The assignment is worth a total of 175 points. DUE DATE You are to submit your paper to the Week 6 Dropbox by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6.

REQUIREMENTS Through this assignment, the student will:

1. Critique a peer-reviewed study, and in your own words, describe the research question, sample, design of study, data collection method, findings, and limitations of each. (CO 1, CO2,)

2. Summarize the research article and evaluate the significance to nursing. Do not just quote the author’s words. Paraphrase the information. (CO 4, CO5).

GUIDELINES TO WRITING THE PAPER

1. Course Resources lists articles from which you are to selectONE to analyze.

2. Retrieve the full-text version of the article from the library. Read it thoroughly.

3. Introduction (one paragraph): The introduction should be interesting and capture the reader’s attention.

a. Provide a brief description of the research article to be discussed.

b. Discuss the purpose of your paper. The purpose statement of the paper should relate to the research article reviewed and the implications that it has to evidence based nursing practice.

c. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

4. Describe the research question for this study in a paragraph.

a. Describe the research in greater detail.

b. Include your observations about this question.

c. Discuss events or trends that could have affected this question.

d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

5. Describe the research design of this study, and in your own words discuss the design.

a. Discuss the research design of the study.

b. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the type of design and hypothesize why the author utilized the design as opposed to others.

c. You will need to summarize the information from the article in your own words

6. Describethe sample.

a. Briefly describe the sample size used for this study

b. Make a judgment as to whether the sample size was adequate and defend your answer.

c. Describe the number or participants and determine if the number of participants was adequate compared to the research question and the intent of the study.

d. Are these numbers adequate? Discuss gaps in that you identified.

e. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

7. Describe the data collection method(s)’

a. Who collected the data?

b. What tools were used?

c. What were the ethical considerations addressed and discuss gaps you identified.

d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

8. Describe the limitations of the study.

a. Identify the limitations within the study

b. Describe how the limitations could be overcome in subsequent studies

c. Comment on why limitations are important to list and discuss within a study

d. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

9. Describe the findings reported in the study.

a. Describe the findings reported in the study

b. Discuss whether the findings of the study answered the research question posed within the study

c. Discuss the credibility of the findings

d. If the findings do not support the research question posed within the study, what do you believe is the reason?

e. You will need to summarize and analyze the information from the article in your own words

10. Summary

a. Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper.

b. Include a statement about the research question and the findings.

c. Discuss the probability of implementation into practice. Based on these findings, is the evidence that you found on your topic strong enough to suggest a change in practice, or an idea for practice? d. End with a concluding statement. Nurses-led telephone Intervention program

11. Citations and Referencesmust be included to support the information within each topic area.

Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. In-text citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, “How do I know this?” and then cite the source. 12. Reference Page: The Reference Page should start on a new page (insert a page break). All references should be cited within the body of the paperas (Author, year) and the full reference should be included in APA format on the reference page. A url link alone is not an adequate reference. See the APA Guidelines in Course Resources for examples of properly formatted references.

GRADING CRITERIA Category Points % Description Research Question 20 11% Describe, analyze, and summarize the research question for this study your own words. Design of Study 20 11% Describe, analyze, and summarize the research design of this study in your own words. Sample/Population of the Study 25 14% Describe, analyze, and summarize the sample in your own words. Data Collection Methods 25 14% Describe, analyze, and summarize the data collection method(s)’ in your own words. Limitations 20 12% Describe, analyze, and summarize the limitations of the study in your own words. Findings 20 12% Describe, analyze, and summarize the findings reported in the study in your own words. Summary of Article (See rubric for categories and breakdown of points.) 25 14% Summarize important points from the body of your paper including the key components of the paper and discuss the probability of implementation into practice. Grammar, Punctuation, and Spelling/ APA Formatting 20 12% No errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and APA formatting. Total 175 100% A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. NR439 Articles List for Week 6 Research Article Critique Katon, W., Russo, J., & Gavin, A. (2014). Predictors of postpartum depression. Journal of Women’s Health (15409996), 23(9), 753-759. doi:10.1089/jwh.2014.4824. (7p.) Persistent link to this record (Permalink): http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=103890366&site=eds-live&scope=site Murfet, G. O., Allen, P., &Hingston, T. J. (2014). Maternal and neonatal health outcomes following the implementation of an innovative model of nurse practitioner-led care for diabetes in pregnancy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(5), 1150-1163.doi:10.1111/jan.12277. (14p.) Persistent link to this record (Permalink): http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104059264&site=eds-live&scope=site Stavrianopoulos, T. (2016). Impact of a nurses-led telephone Intervention program on the quality of life in patients with heart failure in a district hospital of Greece. Health Science Journal, 10(4), 1. Persistent link to this record (Permalink): http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=118362668&site=eds-live&scope=site

Nurses-led telephone Intervention program

Place your order now for a similar paper and have exceptional work written by our team of experts to guarantee you A Results

ordernowcc-green